Cloud Foundation: BLM poised to eradicate last large wild horse herds in Wyoming; BLM Responds

Cloud Foundation: BLM poised to eradicate last large wild horse herds in Wyoming; BLM Responds

ROCK SPRINGS — The Cloud Foundation, an advocacy group for wild horses, has issued the following press release regarding the removal of wild horses from the checkerboard.

The BLM has also issued a response that is printed in full at the bottom of the post.

Update Lawsuit Filed

Advertisement - Story continues below...

BLM poised to eradicate last large wild horse herds in Wyoming

US Congressman, Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), supports listing of wild horses as endangered species


ROCK SPRINGS  – The Cloud Foundation (TCF) with 280,000 followers, as well as numerous wild horse and animal advocacy groups, condemns the Bureau of Land Management’s scheduled roundup which will eliminate all wild horses on 1.2 million acre checkerboard land (alternating one mile square sections of private and public land for 20 miles on either side of Interstate 80) within the Great Divide Basin, Adobe Town and Salt Wells Creek Herd Management Areas (HMA).  The roundup of 946 wild horses is the first step in the planned total elimination of all wild horses in Great Divide Basin and Salt Wells Creek.

“Adobe Town, Salt Wells and Great Divide Basin are home to the largest free-roaming wild horse herds left in Wyoming,” states Carol Walker, renowned equine photographer and Wild Horse Freedom Federation (WHFF) Board member. Walker has photographed the unique southwestern Wyoming herds for 10 years. “Genetic tests link the Adobe Town herd to horses re-introduced to the America’s by the Spanish in the 1500s. Great Divide Basin wild horses are descended from Calvary remounts,” she continues.  “To lose the wild horses in this vast landscape known by local residents as the ‘Big Empty’ would be to lose touch with our western history, heritage, and the untamed spirit of the West.”

The roundups, aimed at appeasing the powerful Rock Springs Grazing Association (RSGA), are in compliance with a Consent Decree between the BLM and RSGA, a back door deal allegedly encouraged by then-Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar. According to the Consent Decree the BLM agrees to zero out Divide Basin and Salt Wells, arguing that these unfenced wild lands allow mustangs to freely roam into private land in the checkerboard areas. Yet even in the Adobe Town HMA, which contains only a small portion of land within the checkerboard, the BLM intends to slash the herd by 100% leaving only 500 horses on over 400,000 acres of federal lands.

While BLM and RSGA contend that 1,912 wild horses overpopulate the 2.4 million acres within the HMA’s, TCF and WHFF research reveals that 356,222 cattle and 45,206 sheep graze the same lands under federally subsidized grazing leases. While cattle and sheep are not on the range year round like wild horses, the monthly average of 68,740 cattle and 10,741 sheep is staggering compared to fewer than 2,000 wild horses.  Livestock, not wild horses overpopulate and degrade the rangelands.

TCF and other advocate groups question the legality of BLM’s Decision to reduce herd levels far below Appropriate Management Levels (AMLs) set in their own Resource Management Plans, and without an Environmental Assessment as required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

“Wild horse and burro herds and the federal lands on which they roam are under fire from those seeking to control land currently owned by the American public,” states Ginger Kathrens, Volunteer Executive Director of TCF.  Since 1971 wild horses and burros have lost over 20 million acres of habitat. 339 wild horse herds were designated for protection on western ranges when the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act was passed. Today only 179 herds remain. 70% of the remaining herds are no longer genetically viable due to their small herd sizes. The intent of the forward thinking, environmentally sound and unanimously passed 1971 Act has been totally ignored by the agency charged with protecting wild horses and burros.

As recently as July 10, Utah Representative Chris Stewart introduced HR 5058, The Wild Horse Oversight Act of 2014 which, according to a Salt Lake Tribune article, “could allow states to sell wild horses to slaughter.”

“Apparently, Congressman Stewart is not satisfied with the sweetheart deal welfare ranchers have had for decades, in which they pay virtually nothing to run their cattle and sheep on land owned by the American public,”  Kathrens says. She also attributes the dire situation to BLM’s bungling of the Wild Horse and Burro Program. “BLM has turned their back on management practices that would allow for the animals to live out their lives in freedom, rather than languishing in costly holding pens and pastures.”

“Wild horses are between a rock and a hard place.  The BLM wants to eliminate them in Wyoming, and Utah Congressman Stewart wants states to have the authority to eliminate them on federal rangeland,” states Paula Todd King, TCF Director of Communications. “This is why The Cloud Foundation joined Friends of Animals in filing a Petition to List North American Wild Horses under the Endangered Species Act.”

“With the myriad of threats posed to the remaining wild horse herds in America, it is past time that we look to science to guide their management on our public lands,” states US Representative Raul Grijalva (AZ).  “I support The Cloud Foundation’s call for wild horses to be federally protected under the ESA.”

The ESA petition’s introduction states:

The primary threats to wild horses on federal public land are habitat loss, inadequate regulation, and excessive round-ups and removals. Overall, wild horses on federal public lands face the threat of extinction due to at least four factors identified in the ESA. First, habitat loss, particularly from cattle grazing, mining, energy exploration, and urban expansion, endangers the distinct population segment (“DPS”). Second, human utilization threatens the species, specifically removal and sterilization to reduce the population and allow commercial grazing. Third, existing regulatory mechanisms are inadequate to manage the threats that face wild horses and may, in fact, constitute an independent threat to their survival. Finally, other natural and manmade factors also threaten the continued existence of wild horses in the United States, including their artificially fragmented range and small population size. Thus, it is vital to the survival of this population segment of wild horses that it becomes federally protected under the ESA

BLM Response

In response to the Cloud Foundation press release BLM High Desert District Public Affairs Spcialist Shelley Gregory said that:
“The removal of all wild horses from the checkerboard comes at the request of private land owners and to comply with the court-ordered 2013 Consent Decree for Rock Springs Grazing Association vs. Salazar and Section 4 of the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act of 1971. The BLM is honoring its obligations to private land owners and the law. 
The consent decree prescribed the removal of all wild horses from the checkerboard according to a set schedule: in 2013, Adobe Town/Salt Wells Creek; in 2014, Great Divide Basin; in 2015, White Mountain; and in 2016, a follow-up throughout the checkerboard. The 2013 Adobe Town/Salt Wells Creek gather did not remove all wild horses in the checkerboard; thus, the checkerboard areas of these herd management areas (HMAs) were added to the 2014 schedule as a compliance action. 
The Great Divide Basin, Adobe Town and Salt Wells Creek HMAs total approximately 2,427,220 acres, with 1,242,176 acres in the checkerboard. The majority of private land in the HMAs is in the checkerboard. These private lands are owned or controlled by the Rock Springs Grazing Association and the BLM respects the right of private land owners to manage their lands as they deem appropriate.
Wild horses will remain in the solid blocks of public land in the Great Divide Basin, Adobe Town and Salt Wells Creek HMAs after the removal of wild horses from the checkerboard.
Not removing wild horses in the checkerboard would result in non-compliance with 
Section 4 of the Act, its implementing regulations found at 43 CFR 4700 and the provisions of the 2013 Consent Decree. Non-compliance would essentially place the BLM in contempt of court, necessitating further action at the court’s discretion.”
online poll by Opinion Stage